The T-E-E-P Model: Build Ads That Stay Optimized Forever
You're three months into a campaign. Performance looks incredible, CPA is dropping, spend is climbing. Your client loved you.
Then it stopped. Not gradually, but suddenly.
The same creative that was printing money last quarter is now burning budget. You launch new variations of the past winners, but they flop. You try different hooks…same result. You're stuck in what we call the "creative saturation wall" that moment when your audience has seen everything you've got and stopped caring.
Most performance marketers think this is a creative problem (or an ad account structure issue.)
But it's not.
It's a psychology infrastructure problem, and we can prove it. Once you understand how human decision-making actually works, you'll never hit that wall again.
Why Your "Funnel Thinking" Is Sabotaging Your Scale
If we had to take a guess at your current strategy, it would probably look something like this:
Top of funnel = awareness
Middle of funnel = consideration
Bottom of funnel = conversion
This framework makes for a nice graph, but it doesn't show almost any of the "messy middle" - the place where customers are just cycling through information gathering, TikTok posts, and their friend's product stash.
No customer wakes up Monday morning and thinks, "Today I shall begin my awareness journey for protein powder."
Instead, they're spending most of their "journey" scrolling Instagram. They may see a friend's transformation photo, like a post from their favorite influencer, or get tagged in a giveaway and suddenly they're in-market. (Right now. Not in 6 weeks after your nurture sequence.)
The funny thing about post-2018 customers is that they're experiencing all funnel stages simultaneously.
People know solutions exist (aware), they're googling options (exploring), they're reading reviews (evaluating), and they're ready to buy if you make it easy enough (purchasing).
The traditional funnel assumes customers convert anywhere from 7 to 47-days. But real customers are making decisions in all sorts of ranges…anywhere from 4 hours to 4 years.
That natural expansion and compression is what's killing you at scale.
But there is a strategy that can help.
The Consumer Decision Nexus: A New Framework
Forget funnels for a second. Let's think in psychological states instead.
Your customer exists in one of 4 distinct cognitive modes at any given moment. Each mode has different informational needs, different emotional drivers, and different decision-making biases that need to be accounted for as you start building ads.
Your job is to have pre-built creative assets that match whichever state they're currently in.
Not where you want them to be…where they actually are.
Let me break down each state and show you how to identify it:
State 1: The Trigger Event (When Problems Suddenly Become Conscious)
What's happening in their brain:
When a customer is in a Trigger state, something just interrupted their normal pattern. Could be a major life change, a seasonal shift, a pain point that crossed a threshold, or any number of things. Suddenly their brain's reticular activating system or R-A-S (basically, a mental spotlight) is scanning for solutions to a problem they didn't consciously have yesterday.
Some examples of Trigger Phase customers include:
New parents googling "how to function on 3 hours of sleep."
Someone whose jeans don't fit anymore.
A guy who just got promoted and realizes his wardrobe screams "intern."
The trigger creates the market. Not your ad.
Why most brands miss this:
They run generic "awareness" ads in a conversion campaign instead of targeting specific catalyst moments in a true TOF structure (link click or traffic campaigns). They wait for customers to come to them, which is a bad move.
What to run instead:
True Trigger ads always trigger the "when's" of life.
They're not meant to convert right away, they're specifically built to call out a type of customer based on the experience they're currently having. Ads that say: "Just brought home a puppy? Here's what nobody tells you about the first week!" tend to make great Trigger ads because they're not trying to sell…they're just trying to activate.
Situational Triggers
Seasonal Triggers
Pain Point Amplification
Could all be considered "Trigger" ads due to their ability to get a customer to think about their problem at a time where they might have completely forgotten about it.
The science behind this:
Your brain is constantly scanning for things in your environment that might be important, noteworthy, different, or downright odd. The brain's ability to filter out mundane things (like the sound of your refrigerator) and focus on the notable (like the sound of a knock at the door) is called the Availability Heuristic.
If your brand is present during multiple trigger moments (thereby becoming important, noteworthy, different, or even odd) your audience assumes you're something worth paying attention to.
Even if they don't need you yet.
The tactical play:
You can (and should) run Trigger ads year-round and rotate them monthly. When someone finally experiences the specific catalyst you're calling out in your ads, you become the default choice.
Familiarity breeds trust at a subconscious level. And trust converts.
State 2: Exploration (When They're Building Their Options List)
What's happening in their brain:
During the Exploration Phase, people cycle through what psychologists call "System 2 thinking"—deliberate, analytical, exhaustive-style thinking. They're googling a lot, reading reviews, and watching YouTube comparisons. They're building a mental shortlist for when they need to make critical decisions down the road.
They want to feel smart about this decision they're trying to make.
Why most brands fail here:
Brands that really struggle to create good Exploration ads tend to focus too much on product features instead of relatable problem articulation. They try to be clever instead of clear.
Big mistake.
The human brain interprets complexity as risk, which is why this phase demands easy-to-process ads. In general, this phase takes a while to cycle through, which is why you need to carefully consider the types of ads you create for this phase.
What to run instead:
Demonstration ads. Show your product in their actual context. Not a studio. Not perfect lighting. Their messy kitchen. Their car. Their gym bag. Get ultra clear on where your product or service can be used, and show lots of use cases if possible.
Contrast positioning. Exploring their options will often leave people needing more information about the industry itself instead of your specific product. Sharing information on the what, when, where, why, and how of your industry will help build trust: "Traditional protein powder: chalky, gives you gas, takes 3 minutes to mix. Ours: mixes with a spoon, digests clean, actually tastes like real food."
Real testimonials in real language. Now is the time to swipe phrases directly from Reddit threads, TikTok comments, or website reviews and use them. When someone hears their exact internal dialogue spoken back to them, it creates instant resonance which is what we want.
Recall is one of the most important assets marketing creates.
Every customer service question is a pre-optimization opportunity. Surface the real objections and answer them proactively inside your ads so people can learn along with you.
The science behind this:
Information that's easy to process feels more true (this is a common mental shortcut called Cognitive Fluency.) Complicated language and unclear visuals create a lot of mental friction, and mental friction tells the brain that whatever it's spending time will consume too much energy.
During the Exploration phase specifically, ads beat clever ones. Every time.
The tactical play:
Strip your messaging down to an 8th-grade reading level. Short sentences. Repeat your core benefit in multiple formats (visual, text, voiceover, etc.) Make understanding effortless for your customer's brain, and you'll gather a lot more eyeballs quickly and easily.
State 3: Evaluation (When Doubt Becomes the Enemy)
What's happening in their brain:
At this point, they've narrowed it down to maybe you and one competitor (maybe just you!) But now they're stuck in their Exploring cycle and don't quite know how to get out. They're not asking "Will this work?" They're asking "What if I waste my money?" or "What if there's something better I haven't found?"
"What if, what if, what if??"
They want to buy. They just need permission to stop doubting.
Why most brands fail here:
They add more information instead of removing perceived risk. Brands who really struggle to create good Evaluation ads are typically the ones who pile on features, overcomplicate their messaging, and push "transformations" more than anything else.
The customer doesn't need more reasons to buy. They need fewer reasons not to.
What to run instead:
Mass social proof, not one glowing testimonial. During the Evaluation Phase, try and offer a montage of 15-20 quick customer soundbites. (Pro tip: "12,000 five-star reviews" is more persuasive than reading one perfect review because of the Bandwagon Effect: humans assume large groups have already done the vetting for them.)
Transparent value breakdowns. Show the math. 👏 Transparency kills skepticism, so wherever you can, show how valuable your product is from the ground floor up: "$2.14 per meal vs. $12 for takeout = you save $287/month."
Risk reversal. Now is the time to show off your money-back guarantees, your free returns, and your trial periods. Make the decision feel reversible in their mind. Once they have the product (Endowment Effect), they won't want to return it anyway, so give them every reason to say "yes".
Authority borrowed from others. If you have any sort of clout in your industry (we're talking authority proof like: "As seen in Forbes," or "Recommended by dermatologists,") use it. Media mentions and expert endorsements are trust shortcuts. If a credible third party vetted you, the customer's brain doesn't have to work as hard to figure out if you're legit.
The science behind this:
People view options as more different than they actually are (a mental shortcut called Distinction Bias.) Your job is to identify the one dimension where you're objectively different and hammer it relentlessly.
Not 12 benefits. One differentiator. Figure out what makes you truly differentiated in your market, then say it over and over (in every ad, every email, every text) until you're blue in the face:
"The only protein powder with third-party heavy metal testing on every batch."
"The only mattress with a 365-night trial."
"The only skincare line formulated by actual dermatologists, not influencer-dermatologists."
This is true "USP-style" marketing. There's a reason it's been around for centuries.
The tactical play:
Find your singular differentiator, then make it impossible to ignore. Repeat it in every evaluation-stage asset you create.
State 4: Purchase (When Friction Kills Conversions)
What's happening in their brain:
By the time we've reached the Purchase Phase, we're at the finish line. We've put in the work by running Trigger ads to true top of funnel customers, letting them Explore with ads built to help them discover what the industry has to offer, Evaluated their options together, and now they're ready to buy.
But their brain is still screaming, "Are you SURE?"
This is where analysis paralysis happens. These days customers have way too many options, too many steps, and too much thinking to do before making a purchase decision.
Decision fatigue is real. And it's expensive.
Why most brands fail here:
Brands that struggle during this phase really only make one big mistake: they default to discounting.
"20% off if you buy today!"
Here's the problem with discounting too often: discounting trains customers to wait for sales. It devalues your product, and it doesn't actually address the psychological friction your customers are facing during the Purchasing Phase.
What to run instead:
Scarcity (but only if it's real). We recommend using this sparingly, but limited inventory, time-bound bonuses, and seasonal exclusivity really does work. The Scarcity Principle is simple: we value things more when they're less available. So make sure you're letting your customers know when things are running out.
Critical caveat: This only works if it's true. Fake countdown timers destroy trust permanently, so please don't use them.
Behavioral nudges. Retarget your customers with simple: "You were looking at this" ads featuring the exact product they viewed. "Still thinking about [product name]?" The Zeigarnik Effect states that incomplete actions create psychological tension and a desire to finish the action they started previously. Your ad is offering closure here.
Frictionless checkout. Wherever possible, reduce the amount of decisions the brain has to make in order to buy. One-click buys. Saved payment info. Mobile-optimized. Every additional step costs you 20-30% of buyers, so keep your process streamlined and efficient.
Complementary add-ons. After someone commits, their brain seeks to justify the decision (Post-Decision Rationalization) by continuing to participate in the act of shopping. Running ads towards: "completing the set" or "items other customers also bought" leverages this Consistency Bias. They've already decided you're trustworthy, now they're open to secondary purchases.
Critical caveat: whenever possible, make sure you're suggesting products that naturally make sense. Offering a product or service that has no correlation to things they've already purchased leads to both frustrated customers, and odd inventory stock.
The anti-discount strategy:
Instead of "20% off," try:
"Free upgrade to express shipping."
"Free bonus product with purchase."
"Free mystery gift."
Same cost to you. Higher perceived value to them.
The Year-Round Deployment Model (Why Campaigns Are Killing Your Scale)
Here's where things come together. If you only run ads when you have a sale to run, you're losing to brands that run psychological trigger ads 365 days a year. Your customer doesn't think about your product category daily, they think about it when a trigger event activates the need.
If you're dark when their trigger happens, you don't exist.
This is why we suggest running all 4 categories of ads year round.
Let's say you sell pre-made meal prep products. You run ads in January (to captures some of that New Year magic) and September (since back to school is a busy time of year).
You run some random ads outside of these periods, but nothing special.
Your ideal customer might experience their trigger event in April (after starting a new job) or July (when vacation body panic sets in) or November (after getting engaged and wanting to "get healthy" before the wedding).
Their Trigger events are happening all year round, but you missed them because you were planning your ads based on your needs…not theirs. Your competitor who runs trigger event ads year-round didn't.
Which is why they got the sale.
The creative saturation solution:
No matter what your monthly spend, you face a unique challenge running ads these days: creative exhaustion. You've burned through the obvious angles, and your team is recycling concepts. Performance plateaus.
The fix isn't "better creative." It's more psychological coverage across all 4 phases of the customer journey.
Instead of 500 ads per month, you need:
20% Trigger (rotated by calendar, trends, cultural moments)
30% Explore (different use cases, different personas)
30% Evaluate (social proof variations, risk reversals)
20% Purchase (scarcity plays, behavioral nudges)
That's 60-75+ distinct psychological plays in rotation.
Using this "T-E-E-P" method, you're not really "testing creative" anymore. You're deploying psychological infrastructure that auto-optimizes based on whatever mental state the customer is in.
How to Justify This to Clients (The Data-Backed Defense)
If you manage big accounts, you can't walk into meetings saying, "Trust me, this'll work." You'll need some mental defensibility. Here's how:
Map every creative asset to three things:
The psychological state it targets (Trigger/Exploration/Evaluation/Purchase)
The cognitive bias it targets (Scarcity, Social Proof, Cognitive Fluency, Loss Aversion)
The emotional outcome it promises (Safety, Belonging, Status, Relief)
Now when a client asks, "Why are we running this ad?" you don't say, "It tested well."
You say: "This is a Loss Aversion play targeting customers in the Evaluation state who need risk mitigation to convert. It's based on Kahneman's Prospect Theory. We're seeing 34% higher conversion in this segment."
We're engineering wins here.
And engineering is defensible.
Now, you can't execute this with a Slack channel and a Canva subscription. You'll need a system that can handle tracking this kind of journey-focused targeting across the account:
Psychological trigger taxonomy. Categorized by event type, segment, emotional state.
Continuous sentiment mining. Reddit threads. TikTok comments. Amazon reviews. Customer support tickets. Real language from real people.
Creative production velocity. 10-15 new assets weekly. Minimum.
Automated psychological tagging. So you know which bias each ad activates.
Real-time performance mapping. Which psychological plays work for which segments.
This is why most brands stall at scale. They try to do this manually. Creative teams burn out. They default to "more of what worked last month."
But there is a shortcut:
AI can handle the psychological pattern recognition, and humans handle execution.
You don't need a bigger team. You need a system that continuously identifies new trigger events, new language patterns, new social proof angles, and auto-generates creative briefs.
Your team focuses on making it look good. The system focuses on making it work.
The Competitive Moat You're Actually Building
When you shift from "running ads" to "deploying psychological infrastructure," you create something competitors can't copy:
Saturation insurance.
While they recycle 5 hooks for 90 days until performance dies, you're rotating through 75+ psychological triggers. Your brand never feels stale.
While they guess what resonates, you mine real-time sentiment and feed it into your pipeline.
While they're stuck in creative review hell, you've automated ideation. Your team only executes. That's the unfair advantage.
Not "better ads". Better infrastructure.
It's time you stop thinking in TOF, MOF, or BOF (or TOFU, MOFU, or BOFU, if you're old school). It's time you start thinking in psychological trigger states.
The brands winning at scale don't have the best creative teams.
They have the best creative operating systems.









